Hi one of my players choose to play a Navajo character but none of the classic backgrounds seems to work for what she wanted to play. I know there is the New World manual but I don't really feel to spend all that money only to get the chance of a fitting background. Should I go with a homebrew one (if so, what should I choose?) or should I find another way to get the New World manual? I don't really like the second choice to be honest, but I really need just the background part of it

submitted by /u/Arteminir
[link] [comments]

I am learning the 1st edition rules to run for our group. I can’t find an answer to the question, and there is some conflicting information.

Non-dracheneisen armor isn’t used because it is heavy and can be pierced by modern Thean weapons, but Eisenfaust requires an armored gauntlet.

It doesn’t seem fair that an Eisen hero would have to buy both the dracheneisen and swordsman school advantages.

It also doesn’t seem realistic that the official Eisen swordsman school would require this special armor that is only available to nobles.

Thank you in advance.

submitted by /u/Vappit
[link] [comments]

Read up and let your voice be heard!

https://www.chaosium.com/blogchaosium-announces-studio-agate-as-the-new-developer-for-7th-sea/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwLjQK1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHsX2gsGoGADfqzPT1iAimabl71QlBGrkGjV7fXXYTKnw-feziF1KV1VvLjYi_aem_D_4UOLwU1tb_SuuhsMhzvQ

submitted by /u/BluSponge
[link] [comments]

I started following a campaign called Navigavia, it is a setting of some Italian youtubers. In this setting there are described 3 new monstrous qualities, but among the monsters there are some that have two monstrous qualities that I can not find either in the 7th sea manual or in the Navigavia manual. These two monstrous qualities are: Destructive and Colossal. For those who have the manual the Kraken has both qualities. submitted by /u/GreenChicken4349
[link] [comments]

I am learning to play S7;CoFS, and I cannot find anything that says what these tokens are. I would appreciate ethe help. Thank you!

submitted by /u/TheVampyrMeister
[link] [comments]

So the Khatai expansion books were analogs for South Korea, Japan, and India if im not mistaken- what happened to these? Were any of these released? Are they still in production?

submitted by /u/Shamsse
[link] [comments]

Hi everyone! I'm looking for 3 to 6 players for an online campaign inspired by the world and tone of One Piece, using the 7th Sea system (with some light homebrew adjustments). We'll be playing on Roll20, and voice chat will be through Discord.

About the Game This is a swashbuckling adventure full of strange islands, larger-than-life powers, ancient secrets, and a lot of heart. While it's heavily inspired by One Piece, no prior knowledge of the series is required—just a desire to dive into an epic world of pirates, marines, wild science, and dreams that change the world.

Important Notes:

I'm not a native English speaker, so I may occasionally fumble words or take a moment to describe things. I ask for your patience and understanding. -I'm not a professional or veteran DM, but I’m here to make sure everyone has fun and feels involved. -You don’t need to be an expert in 7th Sea or tabletop RPGs—if you’re new, I’ll help you learn as we go! -The tone is narrative-focused, with big emotional arcs, cinematic fights, and room for character development.

Interested? If you’re excited about creating a unique pirate (or marine!) and going on a grand adventure, feel free to DM me here on Reddit, or message me on Discord: dinotrax500

Let’s make something unforgettable togethe

submitted by /u/dinotrax500
[link] [comments]

submitted by /u/negromaestro
[link] [comments]

Tomorrow for the first time in decades but I'm finally running a 7th Sea game again.

Going to do this old school (except for going to the library to photocopy character sheets, going to print them off). No computers, no distractions.

submitted by /u/BilbyCoder
[link] [comments]

Anyone running 7th Sea in Houston?

submitted by /u/TheRealPorterStern
[link] [comments]

Any German players here?

Deutscsprachige hier anwesend?

submitted by /u/Horrgath
[link] [comments]

Hi everyone, I'm new to the game and I desperately need your help for some homebrew crafting, since I couldn't find nothing about special items in-game. I'm running a campaign where monsters represent an actual challenge, so I would like to set a big reward for my players by crafting useful items with their skin, teeth ecc. The fact is that I don't know what could be balanced or broken, so I'm asking for your help. An exemple could be a sea monster with a hard skin which if wore by a PG prevents some damage. Thank you

submitted by /u/Arteminir
[link] [comments]

For the life of me, I cannot find the timeline anywhere. Does anyone have a copy of know where I can find the full one? There used to be a website that listed everything from prehistory to 1672 or so, but I can't locate that either.

submitted by /u/ridethedirt
[link] [comments]

After years of dnd, i wanted to try 7th. I wanna play a one shot just to try the game, any suggestions?

submitted by /u/PeppoDiAstora
[link] [comments]

Greetings all, I am brand new to 7th Sea, but a veteran TTRPG player. Making a character to play with the Guild of San Marcos at conventions. While looking at the (overwhelming number of) Sword Schools, the following three caught my interest. Which (if any) would be good for only playing a couple times a year at conventions? Which is marginally friendly to new players? Which “comes online” early (in other words, which doesn’t suck as a beginning character)?

Swordsman Schools Ussura Bogatyr

Vendel/Vesten Anders Vodacce Cappuntina

Thanks!

submitted by /u/webspinner202
[link] [comments]

submitted by /u/malicewagon
[link] [comments]

Hello fellow bucklers of swashes. I'm working with my longtime group and getting back into 7th Sea. I've always loved the idea of Riposte but hated how clunky the mechanics are of mentally shifting around ranks. I am good with moving stuff around abstractly in my head but many of my players aren't, so I was wondering if anyone had changed how Riposte behaved.

Idea 1: Make your Parry and Attack, both at -10, and add your ranks in Riposte as a flat bonus to those rolls. Riposte is an extremely powerful ability, so that penalty may need to increase to -15?

Idea 2: Make your Parry and Attack, both at -5, with your ranks in Riposte added back as a flat bonus (thus, 5 ranks means no penalty), but the attack does less damage. A rapier would do 2k1, a knife would do 1k1.

Thanks!

submitted by /u/ridethedirt
[link] [comments]

Has anyone noticed that Studio Agate has a new Kickstarter getting ready to launch, promising "A New Journey" for 7th Sea?

I'm guessing this is the big news that Studio Agate and Chaosium keep hinting about. Does anyone have any more info?

submitted by /u/Imaginary-Newt3972
[link] [comments]

CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR CIRCULATION
EXPLORER'S SOCIETY INTERNAL ARCHIVE
Field Analysis Document 771-Delta / Author: Dr. Quentin Lysander Trague
Title: "Echoes of the Engine: A Unified Theory of Prelapsarian-Originated Thaumaturgy"

Prologue: The Heretic’s Whisper

Should this manuscript fall into the custody of ecclesiastical authorities, I will no doubt be subject to conflagration. If apprehended by more clandestine ecclesiastic agents, I may find myself either consigned to oblivion or sequestered indefinitely. Should the Crown of Avalon deign to scrutinize this treatise, I would expect my existence to be ceremoniously redacted from all institutional ledgers. Nevertheless, I write.

I am Dr. Quentin Lysander Trague, Senior Carto-Cryptologist of the Western Arc and once-affiliated Scholar Emeritus of the Probabilistic Observatorium of Vodacce. I have trodden within no fewer than three dozen antecedent archaeological anomalies from Ifri to Montaigne, have stood beneath ancient crystalline constructs vibrating with harmonic intelligibility, and have borne witness to blood-driven phenomena in Montaigne estates most decadent and degenerative. I have seen. And my comprehension has been irrevocably altered.

I assert unequivocally: Thaumaturgy is not divine. It is not a sacrament. It is not born of mythopoetic origin.
It is residual interface. A relic of a civilization immeasurably more advanced, whose mastery of cosmological infrastructure renders our petty lexicons—magic, miracle, myth—tragically insufficient.

What we ignorantly denominate “sorcery” is, in verity, merely the vestigial operational subroutine of an extinct metaphysical apparatus.

Section I: The Inheritance Delusion

Contemporary scholarship presumes the arcane faculties are manifestations of divine selection or hereditary sanctification. This assumption is intellectually bankrupt. The so-called “bloodlines” of sorcerous talent appear to operate according to protocols of genetic authorization—fixed channels of metaphysical syntax assigned via lineage not by chance or miracle, but by design.

Let us commence with the art of Porte. It operates through geometrically encoded spatial violation, requiring sacrificial catalysts and mnemonic anchors. This suggests not mystical spontaneity, but structured access to unnatural corridors—an architecture of translocation governed by sacrosanct numerical constants. It is a gated protocol, not an act of will.

Glamour exhibits even more egregious characteristics of systematized artifice. Its practitioners emulate personas from a mythic continuum, yet the transformation does not occur merely in perception—it is ontological. This is congruent with the superimposition of archetypal overlays—an ancient psychosympathetic system that reconstitutes identity within the parameters of symbolic resonance.

As for Sorte, its practitioners manipulate what is universally misidentified as fate. In truth, they perceive and influence a quantum-interconnective lattice—a construct of such sophistication that it mimics destiny itself. What they call threads are, in fact, relational vectors, observable only by those possessing the biologic heuristic to interface with the system’s remaining access points.

In every instance, what is referred to as sorcery obeys rule-bound phenomenology—an axiomatic behavior wholly incongruent with supernatural spontaneity.

Section II: Geocultural Parallels

Expanding beyond Théah, we find these modalities echoed in disparate geographies.

Within the Crescent lands, the discipline of Qisma invokes transformation through invocation of sacred nomenclature. These are not mere incantations. Their structure and semantic patterning align with inscriptions found upon obelisks and glyphic panels associated with antecedent ruins. These “names” are not prayer—they are command inputs.

In Ifri, Azyr practitioners manifest fire responsive to linguistic modulation and gestural rhythm. This implies a phonoresponsive bioenergetic interface, reminiscent of harmonic actuators recovered in certain catacombs beneath Mbey.

In the Atabean isles, the so-called shamans engage with oceanic and meteorological intelligences. If these forces are not merely animistic personifications, then they are ambient operating intelligences, semi-autonomous remnants of climatic regulation systems.

The crystal-based blood sorcery of the Tzak K’an cultures, meanwhile, provides perhaps the most transparent correlation to ancient technology. Their artifacts hum, illuminate, and respond. To blood. To song. To rhythm. These are hardware interfaces, misapprehended as spiritual sacraments.

Section III: The Echo Hypothesis

The question then arises—if these systems are not magic, how do they persist?

I propose the Echo Hypothesis: that these are not systems in function, but in recursion. What we experience are redundant sub-processes, remnant instructions embedded within the substrata of physicality itself. They persist because the system was not dismantled—it was abandoned.

These subroutines—be they Glamour, Sorte, Porte, or otherwise—continue because they were designed to be self-correcting, self-renewing, and responsive to anthropomorphic stimuli. We are the interlopers, yes, but we are also the input.

Myth has not emerged around these disciplines as explanation—it is the excreted residue of their function. The myths followed the phenomena, not the inverse. The Old King does not empower Glamour. Glamour generates the Old King.

Section IV: The Faerie as Function

In Avalon, the Sidhe are revered or feared as prelapsarian entities. I contend they are neither spirit nor deity. They are operational maintenance protocols—autonomous intelligences whose function was once to mediate the archetypal field.

Their behaviors are rule-bound. They enforce contract. They punish deviation from narrative logic. They serve myth not because they believe in it, but because they were created to protect it.

On one occasion, I was permitted to cross the threshold of a stone circle reputed to be a Faerie gate. There, a Sidhe emissary pronounced a sequence of utterances in what I recognized as derivative of the glyph-tongue found at Syrneth Node #18-V. The gate opened. Coincidence? I think not.

These beings are not fantasy. They are processes.

Section V: Cataclysmic Considerations

Should we persist in our uncritical usage of these systems—casting, tearing, weaving, invoking—we risk reactivating core functions beyond our comprehension.

We assume the systems are broken. I posit they are merely dormant. The multidimensional lattice might yet reconstitute. The Sidhe might evolve beyond constraint. The Sorte strands might extend into metarealms of determinative logic.

The world itself may respond—not with benevolence, but with system-wide recalibration.

Section VI: Protocol for Interference Minimization

1. All sorcery must be reclassified as Residual Operative Echo Phenomena (ROEPs).
2. Genealogical tracing of sorcerous lines should be reframed as Access Vector Mapping.
3. Sites of high thaumaturgic interaction should be quarantined and stabilized.
4. Cross-discipline activation events must be suppressed to avoid syncretic escalation.
5. Faerie phenomena should be subject to disruption analysis, not folkloric indulgence.

Addendum: The Ecclesiastical Challenge

Let me be clear: I do not refute Theus. I merely suggest that His works may be inscribed upon an antecedent architecture whose function we have only begun to decode.

We walk upon a lattice of intention older than scripture.

Signed,
Dr. Quentin Lysander Trague
Scholar, Explorer’s Society
Codename: Mirrormask

-

INTERNAL USE ONLY — VATICINE DOCTRINAL COMMISSION
Ref. Codex Custodiae No. XVII-CXII
Issued under Authority of His Excellency, Cardinal Bellavère, Prefect of the Office of Sorcerous Anathema and Preternatural Inquiry

Title: A Scholastic Refutation of Dr. Quentin Trague’s Mechanistic Heresy, as Contained in "Echoes of the Engine"

Issued: Feast of Saint Caldus, 1668 A.V.

To the Eminent and Most Reverend Shepherds of Théah, and the Faithful in Communion with the See of Vaticine Authority,

Grace and Apostolic Benediction in Theus our Lord, Who Is and Was and Shall Ever Be. It is the solemn obligation of the Holy Mother Church to rebuke, by syllogistic armament and catechetical jurisprudence, any profane fabrication which seeks to vitiate the divine ontos of supernatural operation.

Having been presented with the subversive manuscript penned by one Dr. Quentin Lysander Trague, henceforth referred to as the Author, whose tractate entitled Echoes of the Engine articulates a philosophical conceit which endeavors to reduce the arcana of thaumaturgical endowment to mere residual emanations of mechanistic provenance, the Commission has reviewed and now offers the following refutation in sanctified erudition.

I. On the Nature of Sorcery as Theopneustic Phenomenon

The Author’s postulation of sorcery as a recursive artifact of a defunct civilizational apparatus denies the univocal dignity of Theus’ providential sovereignty. He posits, fallaciously, that so-called "magic" constitutes a residual operational subroutine, thus converting a metaphysical charism into an impersonal technē, a systematized artifact devoid of teleology or moral intelligibility.

Let the catechumen be reminded that sorcery, though corruptive in its fallen manifestations, is ontologically permitted by Divine Concession (cf. Compendium Theologiae Mysticae, Book II, Caput 4), and must be interpreted as either a perversion of spiritual faculty or a manifestation of preternatural agency—namely angelic or diabolic, under the governance of Theus’ permissive will.

To insinuate that such faculties arise from ancient architecture rather than divine dispensation is to lapse into the heresy of Instrumentalism, wherein grace is displaced by unaided mechanical determinism.

II. On the Ontological Error of Operationalism

The Author’s semantic reduction of arcana to programmable syntax reflects a Neo-Gnostic Instrumentalism, wherein all metaphysical causality is subordinated to empirical vectorization. He fails to comprehend that what appears to modern alchemists and mechanists as “rules” are but vestiges of celestial harmony, whose ordering principle is inscribed not in device, but in the Logos—the eternal Word through whom all being subsists (cf. In Evangelium secundum Ioannem, St. Hieronymus).

In asserting that ritual efficacy arises from patterned input rather than moral intentionality or spiritual congruence, the Author reifies sorcery into an autonomous liturgy, devoid of penitential consequence or moral finality.

III. On the Blasphemy of Faerie as Programmatic Entity

To describe the Sidhe—who by the Church are categorized under the genus Spirituum Ambiguorum—as autonomous regulatory subroutines is not merely erroneous, but a profanation of spiritual taxonomy. The Author’s language transmutes persons into processes, and intelligences into algorithms, thereby effacing the essential distinction between ens rationis and ens spirituale.

The Church affirms, in consonance with Denziger Concordat 1123, that such entities are either malign daemons, fallen intelligences, or at best pagan simulacra, not servomechanisms of a deific machine. To assert otherwise is to stumble into a heresy long condemned.

IV. On the Teleological Horror of the Author’s Eschatology

By positing that the reactivation of these so-called systems might induce a system-wide recalibration of reality, the Author proposes a techno-eschaton bereft of moral judgment, eschatological justice, or beatific culmination. This is contrary to the Creed of Ascendant Prophets, which affirms the Parousia, the final rectification of all reality in the person of Theus.

The vision the Author imparts is not that of Saint Caldus or the revelations of Hierophant Benedictus, but that of a deterministic apocalypse, one governed by machine reflex rather than divine fiat. It is eschatological nihilism masquerading as reason.

Conclusion and Decree

In summation, the tract known as Echoes of the Engine promulgates a multi-fold heresy: it denies the personalism of supernatural agents, subverts the sacramentality of ontology, and ascribes sacred phenomena to defunct techno-idolatry. It is hereby classified under the formal condemnation of Doctrina Mechanica Haeretica.

Let it be expunged from all reputable libraries, its citations annulled, and its author, if apprehended, remanded for ecclesiastical judgment under Canon XV, §3 of the Codex Inquisitorum.

By our seal and under apostolic imprimatur,
+Cardinal Lucien Bellavère
Prefect of the Holy Office
Vaticine Church of Théah
Feast of Saint Caldus, 1668 A.V.

submitted by /u/Solamnaic-Knight
[link] [comments]

What is the core of 7th Sea that no other game achieves? What did you loved that you can't find anywhere else. And what do you hate?

I already played 7th Sea 2e twice. Once it was a one shot by other GM that ended up like DnD with d10s, and the other one was a short adventure ran by myself for about 6 sessions that devolved into calvinball. I couldn't click with the rules and the system broke many times in front of me. I ended up overriding basically all the rules, which is not good.

After some reddit I found that 7th Sea 2e is a bit of a mess, but that some people like it anyway.

I am on a personal project (out of spite) to rethink the system into something that I would enjoy more. I did like most of the ideas as written concepts, they just were so weird in execution. I don't know if I ever would publish anything, but is a fun exercise in design for me. I have a lot of ideas, but I wanted to check with strangers too. Again, I am aware of other similar systems, I'm coming from a design perspective.

So I wanted to ask to people that have played successfully (or unsuccessfully); and people that have read it, what was about this system that you loved? What would you say are the core concepts of this system identity and which changes would make it unrecognizable? What things have you changed, or what kind of changes do you think this game needs?

submitted by /u/Genarab
[link] [comments]